Editorial Policies and Training.

Good policy should help people make better decisions under deadline. It should be clear enough to use, specific enough to guide difficult calls, and flexible enough to fit the organization doing the work.

Policy grounded in practice

A policy manual is useful only when it reflects how reporting, production, editing, and approval actually happen. The work begins by understanding the organization's audience, formats, staffing, deadlines, and recurring editorial risks.

The resulting guidance should distinguish firm requirements from judgment calls, identify who owns difficult decisions, and make escalation possible before a problem becomes a crisis.

Training in the real world

Standards training is most useful when it is built around realistic reporting and production choices rather than abstract rules. Sessions can use scenarios to examine sourcing, attribution, disputed facts, requests for comment, corrections, and the language used to convey uncertainty.

Training draws on more than a decade of experience with journalists at the network level. Each session is tailored to the platform, team, and editorial challenges at hand, with practical guidance that can be put to work immediately.

Discuss an engagement

Start with a brief, non-confidential note.

Describe the project or matter, its current stage, any important deadline, and the editorial standards questions on which input would be most useful.

Start a conversation