Clarify the decision.
Define the project, its stage, the deadline, and the editorial questions that require the closest attention.
Services
Support for consequential reporting.
Who is this for?
- Small newsrooms
- Podcast teams
- Documentary producers
- Independent creators
- Legal counsel
Pre-publication review
Independent review of stories, scripts, podcast episodes, and documentaries for sourcing, verification, fairness, attribution, language, and editorial risk.
Explore the service →02True-crime podcast standards
Standards and ethics guidance for true-crime and narrative podcasts, including sourcing, disputed facts, requests for comment, framing, and corrections.
Explore the service →03Editorial policy and training
Editorial policy development and newsroom standards training for accuracy, fairness, sourcing, verification, corrections, escalation, and approval.
Explore the service →04Defamation expert witness
High-level expert analysis of newsroom standards, sourcing, verification, fairness, and editorial processes.
Explore the service →A practical process
Examine the reporting.
Review the relevant material, sourcing, verification, fairness steps, language, context, and editorial workflow.
Make the guidance usable.
Identify priorities, explain the reasoning, and help the team make decisions it can apply and defend.